Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ethical consumption is widely regarded as a key step toward a more sustainable and just society. This study examines how fundamental well-being orientations shape individuals’ propensity to buy ethically. We distinguish between hedonic orientations, centered on short-term pleasure and the avoidance of discomfort, and eudaimonic orientations, focused on virtue and meaningfulness, even when difficult to achieve. Using survey data collected in December 2023 from general population samples in Switzerland and Japan (n = 2012), we juxtapose eudaimonic and hedonic orientations as motivational foundations of ethical purchases. Results show that eudaimonia is a substantially stronger correlate of ethical consumption than hedonia. We further test three mechanisms underlying this relationship and demonstrate that well-being orientations impact ethical consumption not only through ethical attitudes but also through quality concerns and perceived effort. While the central role of eudaimonia is supported in both countries, the mediating mechanisms vary across contexts. Overall, the findings suggest that ethical consumption should be rooted in a broader rethinking of what constitutes a good life in modern consumer societies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashinaga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: