Why the study?
Despite the widespread use of neuraxial blocks in obstetric anaesthesia, there is a lack of good quality studies evaluating the incidence of associated adverse side effects and severe complications.
What are the complications associated with perinatal neuraxial blocks in parturients?
What are the complications associated with perinatal neuraxial blocks in parturients?
While perinatal neuraxial blocks provide excellent analgesia, they are associated with rare but severe complications (1:1600) that warrant further study using nationwide medical databases.
Neuraxial complications in obstetrics warrant continued clinical vigilance; leaves open precise contemporary incidence estimates from prospective registries.
Regional techniques are the gold standard of obstetric anaesthesia. In both vaginal and Caesarean section deliveries, neuraxial blocks are the most frequently used methods for relieving pain. Although it provides excellent analgesia, regional anaesthesia is associated with certain adverse side effects and possible complications. In this narrative review, we bring together all available data and create a catalogue of complications resulting from the use of perinatal neuraxial anaesthesia which we divide according to their severity and the duration of their impact on patients' health. We focus on complications that have significant or long-term consequences. Even though their incidence is low at 1:1600 neuraxial anaesthetics performed, we believe that better understanding of the possible severe problems that can result from regional anaesthesia procedures would enhance the overall safety of patients during labour, delivery, and the postpartum period. Despite the pivotal role neuraxial techniques play in providing anaesthesia for parturients, there is a lack of good quality studies on the incidence of complications. We believe that a thorough assessment of the occurrence of complications should be carried out by analysing data from nationwide medical databases. By analysing the adverse side effects, both qualitatively and quantitatively, we think it possible to further improve the quality of patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klimkowicz et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: