Why the study?
Quantitative 3D assessment of the aortic root may improve planning and success of aortic valve-sparing operations, but the effects of chronic aortic dilatation and repair required evaluation.
Does aortic valve-sparing surgery improve total coaptation surface area and aortic root geometry in patients with chronic aortic dilatation?
Does aortic valve-sparing surgery improve total coaptation surface area and aortic root geometry in patients with chronic aortic dilatation?
3D-TEE demonstrates that the aortic valve remodels in response to aortic dilatation, and successful valve-sparing surgery corrects these geometric changes by significantly increasing total coaptation surface area.
3D-TEE confirms geometric correction after AV-sparing surgery; leaves open durability and outcome prediction in chronic aortic dilatation.
BACKGROUND: Quantitative 3D assessment of the aortic root may improve planning and success of aortic valve (AV)-sparing operations. AIMS: To use 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to assess the effect of chronic aortic dilatation on aortic root shape and aortic regurgitation (AR) severity and to examine the effects of AV-sparing operations. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine the changes with chronic aortic dilatation, we studied 48 patients, 23 with aortic dilatation (Group 1 ≤ mild AR, n = 13; Group 2 ≥ moderate AR, n = 10) and 25 Controls. To determine the changes in AV-sparing operations, a subgroup of 15 patients were examined pre- and post surgery. 3D-TEE images were analyzed using multiplanar reconstruction (QLAB, Philips, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA, USA) to obtain aortic root areas, diameters, and lengths. We also calculated a novel parameter called total coaptation surface area (TCoapSA), which sums the contact surface area of all the AV cusps. Compared to Controls, Groups 1 and 2 had significantly larger aortic root areas, inter-commissural distances, and cusp heights. Compared to Group 1 and Controls, Group 2 had significantly smaller TCoapSA when adjusted for aortic annular area (P = 0.001) with shorter coaptation height (P < 0.001). In patients undergoing AV-sparing surgery, TCoapSA was significantly larger post surgery (P = 0.001) with greater coaptation height (P < 0.001) and smaller inter-commissural distances (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The aortic valve is a dynamic structure that remodels in response to aortic dilatation. Successful valve-sparing surgery corrects these changes. Quantitative modeling of the aortic valve and root could potentially improve the repair to the individual patients and modify outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ballocca et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: