Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in lymphomas and characterize how FAP and glycolytic markers influence tracer uptake.
Does 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT improve diagnostic performance compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with lymphoma?
Does 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT improve diagnostic performance compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with lymphoma?
68Ga-FAPI PET/CT is inferior to 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing lymphomas with low FAP expression, though it may provide supplementary molecular profiling.
FDG remains preferred for lymphoma staging; level 5 data leaves open any adjunctive FAPI role.
Our objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of ⁶⁸Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein (FAP) inhibitor (FAPI) and ¹⁸F-labeled FDG PET/CT in diagnosing lymphomas and to characterize the influence of FAP and glycolytic markers on tracer uptake by involved lesions. Methods: Participants with different lymphoma subtypes who were prospectively recruited from May 2020 to December 2021 underwent ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate FAP, hexokinase 2, and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) expression, and the paired-samples t test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare parameters. The correlation between the immunochemistry results and tracer uptake was determined by the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results: In total, 186 participants (median age, 52 y [interquartile range, 41–64 y]; 95 women) were included. Dual-tracer imaging produced 3 types of imaging profiles. ¹⁸F-FDG PET possessed a higher staging accuracy (98.4%) than ⁶⁸Ga‐FAPI PET (86.0%). In 5,980 lymphoma lesions, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT detected more nodal (4,624 vs. 2,196) and extranodal (1,304 vs. 845) lesions than ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT. Additionally, 52 ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI–positive/¹⁸F-FDG–negative lesions and 2,939 ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI–negative/¹⁸F-FDG–positive lesions were observed. In many lymphoma subtypes, semiquantitative evaluation revealed no significant differences in SUVmax or target-to-liver ratios between ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (P > 0.05). Interestingly, GLUT1 and hexokinase 2 were overexpressed both in lymphoma cells and in the tumor microenvironment, whereas FAP was expressed only in stromal cells. FAP and GLUT1 expression correlated positively with ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI SUVmax (r = 0.622, P = 0.001) and ¹⁸F-FDG SUVmax (r = 0.835, P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion:⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT was inferior to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing lymphomas with low FAP expression. However, the former may supplement the latter and help reveal the molecular profile of lymphomas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: