Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To evaluate the effect of bevacizumab and sildenafil on stroke parameters in a mouse model, middle cerebral artery occlusion was induced in male C57Bl/6 mice using an intra-arterial filament method. The filament was removed after 60 minutes, and the mice were immediately given a single intraperitoneal injection of saline, bevacizumab, or sildenafil. An additional group of mice (n = 7) received bevacizumab 6 h after MCAO induction. The mice were euthanized 24 hours later and evaluated for infarct area and brain edema using triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining and ImageJ. In the saline-treated mice (n = 16), total stroke volume was 19.20 ± 6.38 mm(3), mean penumbra area was 4.5 ± 2.03 mm(3), and hemispheric asymmetry was 106.5%. Corresponding values in the bevacizumab group (n = 19) were 17.79 ± 5.80 mm(3), 7.3 ± 3.5 mm(3), and 108.6%; in the delayed (6 h) bevacizumab injected mice (n = 7) they were 9.80 ± 8.00 mm(3), 2.4 ± 2.0 mm(3), and 98.2%; and in the sildenafil group (n = 16) they were 18.42 ± 5.41 mm(3), 5.7 ± 2.02 mm(3), and 109.9%. The bevacizumab group had a significantly larger mean penumbra area when given immediately and smaller total stroke area in both groups than the saline- (p = 0.03) and sildenafil-treated (p = 0.003) groups. Only delayed bevacizumab group had reduced edema. Bevacizumab, injected immediately or delayed after injury, exerts a neuroprotective/salvage effect, whereas immediate treatment with sildenafil does not. Inflammation may play a role in the neuroprotective effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novitzky et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: