Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three tricyanometalate precursors, (Bu 4 N)[(PhTp)Fe(CN) 3 ] · H 2 O ( 1 ), (Bu 4 N)[(MeTp)Fe(CN) 3 ] ( 2 ), and (Bu 4 N)[( i BuTp)Fe(CN) 3 ] ( 3 ) [Bu 4 N + = tetrabutylammonium cation; PhTp = tris(pyrazolyl)phenylborate; MeTp = methyltris(pyrazolyl)borate; i BuTp = 2‐methylpropyltris(pyrazolyl)borate], were successfully synthesized. By using 1 – 3 as building blocks, four rectangular clusters, [(PhTp)Fe(CN) 3 Cu(bpy)(H 2 O)(ClO 4 )] 2 · 2H 2 O ( 4 ; bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine), [(PhTp)Fe(CN) 3 Ni(tren)] 2 (ClO 4 ) 2 [ 5 ; tren = tris(2‐amino)ethylamine], [(MeTp)Fe(CN) 3 Ni(tren)] 2 (ClO 4 ) 2 · 2H 2 O ( 6 ), and [( i BuTp)Fe(CN) 3 Ni(tren)] 2 (ClO 4 ) 2 · 2H 2 O · 2CH 3 OH ( 7 ), were prepared in parallel and structurally characterized. All clusters show similar square structures, where Fe III and M II (M = Cu II or Ni II ) ions are alternatively located on the rectangle corners. The cyclic voltammograms of Fe III 2 Ni II 2 clusters 5 – 7 reveal two quasireversible iron‐centered reduction processes and two quasireversible nickel‐centered oxidation processes. Magnetic studies show intramolecular ferromagnetic coupling and appreciable magnetic anisotropy in clusters 4 – 7 . Complexes 5 – 7 show obvious frequency dependence in the alternating current magnetic susceptibility data, which indicates single‐molecule magnet behavior with preexponential factors of τ 0 = 4.5 × 10 –8 s ( 5 ), 6.1 × 10 –8 s ( 6 ), and 5.0 × 10 –8 s ( 7 ) and the effective spin‐reversal barriers of U eff = 17.5 K ( 5 ), 20.6 K ( 6 ), and 20.8 K ( 7 ).(© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2008)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: