Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary. To study the influence of the F gene on follicular dynamics and dominance, 2-year-old Booroola × Finnish Landrace (BFL, N = 17) and Booroola × Suffolk (BS, N = 18) ewes were compared with contemporary purebred Finn (FL, N = 18) and Suffolk (S, N = 18) ewes. In Exp. 1, oestrous cycles of ewes were synchronized during the breeding season with progestagen-impregnated sponges. At sponge removal (Day 0), 14 days after insertion, ewes of each of the 4 genetic groups were assigned to Group 1 in which all follicles visible on both ovaries were destroyed by electrocauterization except for the largest (F1) which was marked, Group 2 in which all visible follicles on both ovaries were destroyed, or Group 3 in which the 3 largest follicles of both ovaries were identified as F1, F2 and F3 and marked. At 48 h after treatment (Day 2), follicular growth was evaluated. At Day 0, the mean number of small follicles (1–3 mm) was higher (P < 0·05) for BS, S and BFL (35·8, 35·1 and 32·9) than FL (24·9) ewes. Large follicles (≥4 mm) were more numerous (P < 0·05) in FL (3·5) than in BS (2·1) ewes, BFL and S ewes being intermediate. Diameter of the F1 follicle was larger (P < 0·05) for S (7·6 mm) than FL, BS and BFL (5·8, 5·1 and 5·1 mm) ewes. In Group 1, all F1 follicles marked at Day 0 ovulated at oestrus after sponge removal for BFL, BS and S ewes while in FL ewes, 2 of 6 F1 follicles regressed. In ewes ovulating, only the Fl follicle ovulated except for one S ewe which shed one more ovum. In Group 2, there were no follicles ≥4 mm at Day 2 and no ewes ovulated after treatment. In Group 3, the proportion of marked follicles that ovulated was higher for S ewes than in those of the prolific genotypes. The number of follicles not marked at Day 0 but ovulating (compared to the total number of ovulations) was higher in BFL, BS and FL (8/11, 9/13 and 9/13) than S (3/10) ewes. In Exp. 2, prolific (BFL + BS) and non-prolific (S) ewes were compared following destruction of follicles ≥3 mm with the F1 left intact (Treatment 1) or destroyed (Treatment 2), 12 days after sponge insertion. At 4 days after treatment (at sponge removal), the numbers of 3–4 mm follicles were not different between the 2 treatments and a very high proportion of the F1 follicles left intact at Day 0 had regressed at Day 4 in both genotypes. From these results, it can be concluded that the higher ovulation rate in Booroola-crossed ewes is not associated with a higher number of recruitable follicles but involves late follicular-phase recruitment and selection combined with smaller preovulatory follicle diameters. Dominance by the largest follicle is not present in ewes of prolific or non-prolific genotypes. In contrast, it is likely that small sized follicles exert a negative effect on growth of large follicles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castonguay et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: