Why the study?
Does continued perioperative aspirin therapy increase hemorrhagic morbidity in patients undergoing liver resection?
Does continued perioperative aspirin therapy increase hemorrhagic morbidity in patients undergoing liver resection?
Continued aspirin therapy during liver resection appears safe and does not increase hemorrhagic morbidity, suggesting interruption may be unnecessary.
Continuing perioperative aspirin may be safe during liver resection without increasing bleeding risk; leaves open.
BACKGROUND: Aspirin is widely used for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disease. Perioperative aspirin may decrease thrombotic morbidity, but may also increase hemorrhagic morbidity. In particular, liver resection carries risks of bleeding, leading to higher risks of hemorrhagic morbidity. Our institution has continued aspirin therapy perioperatively in patients undergoing liver resection. This study examined the safety and feasibility of liver resection while continuing aspirin. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 378 patients who underwent liver resection between January 2010 and January 2016. Patients were grouped according to preoperative aspirin prescription: patients with aspirin therapy (aspirin users, n = 31); and patients without use of aspirin (aspirin non-users, n = 347). RESULTS: Aspirin users were significantly older (P < 0.001), with a higher proportion of males (P < 0.001) and higher frequencies of hypertension (P = 0.004) and diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in intraoperative parameters. Although the frequency of major morbidity tended to be higher among aspirin users than among aspirin non-users, no significant difference was identified. No postoperative hemorrhage was seen among aspirin users. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection can be safely performed while continuing aspirin therapy without increasing hemorrhagic morbidity. Our results suggest that interruption of aspirin therapy is unnecessary for patients undergoing liver resection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monden et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: