Fundamental developments of a unified process design framework for obtaining integrated process and control systems design, which are economically optimal and can cope with parametric uncertainty and process disturbances, are described. Based on a dynamic mathematical model describing the process, including path constraints, interior and end‐point constraints, a model that describes uncertain parameters and time‐varying disturbances (for example, a probability distributions or lower/upper bounds), and a set of process design and control alternatives (together with a set of control objectives and types of controllers), the problem is posed as a mixed‐integer stochastic optimal control formulation. An iterative decomposition algorithm proposed alternates between the solution of a multiperiod “design” subproblem, determining the process structure and design together with a suitable control structure (and its design characteristics) to satisfy a set of “critical” parameters/periods (for uncertainty disturbance) over time, and a time‐varying feasibility analysis step, which identifies a new set of critical parameters for fixed design and control. Two examples are detailed, a mixing‐tank problem to show the analytical steps of the procedure, and a ternary distillation design problem (featuring a rigorous tray‐by‐tray distillation model) to demonstrate the potential of the novel approach to reach solutions with significant cost savings over sequential techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohideen et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: