This review presents a unified treatment of glow discharges with electrostatic confinement of fast electrons. These discharges include hollow cathode discharges, wire and cage discharges, reflect discharges with brush and multirod cathodes, and discharges in crossed electric and magnetic fields. Fast electrons bouncing inside electrostatic traps provide efficient ionization of gas at very low gas pressures. The electrostatic trap effect (ETE) was first observed by Paschen in hollow cathode discharges almost a century ago. The key parameters that define fundamental characteristics of ETE discharges are the ionization length λ N , the penetration range, Λ, and the diffusion length λ of the fast electrons, and two universal geometric parameters of the traps: effective width a and length L . Peculiarities of electron kinetics and ion collection mechanism explain experimental observations for different trap geometries. The ETE is observed only at Λ > a , when the penetration range of the γ -electrons emitted by the cathode exceeds the trap width. In the optimal pressure range, when λ N > a, and Λ < L , the cathode potential fall U c is independent of gas pressure p . With increasing current, U c tends to its upper limit W / eβγ , where β is the percentage of ions arriving at the cathode and W is the gas ionization cost. In the low-pressure range, Λ > L , U c rises from hundreds to thousands of volts. The sign of the anode potential fall, U a , depends on the anode surface S a and its position. When S a is large compared to a critical value S * , U a is negative and small. At S a < S * , the value of U a becomes positive and rises up to 0.5–1 kV with decreasing p ultimately causing discharge extinction. Scaling laws indicate common physics between vacuum discharges and atmospheric pressure micro-discharges. We discuss peculiarities of electron kinetics under different conditions using semi-analytical models. Recent experimental results and applications of glow discharges with electrostatic confinement of fast electrons are described.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolobov et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: