Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis of deuterium isotope effects with L-alanine-d4 and L-serine-d3, and of pH profiles with the same substrates, shows that L-alanine is sticky (that is, reacts to give products 1-7 times as fast as it dissociates) while L-serin is not. The pH profiles show the following: (1) NH3 and monoanionic amino acids are the substrates; (2) a cationic acid group on the enzyme (probably lysine) with a pK of 9.0-9.6 in E-NAD, but a pK well above 10 in E-NADH, must be protonated for activity and good binding of inhibitors and is probably important for maintaining the proper conformation of the enzyme; (3) A cationic acid group on the enzyme (probably histidine) with a pK around 7 in both E-NAD and E-NADA must be unprotonated for oxidation of amino acids but protonated for binding and reaction of pyruvate. This latter group is the acid-base catalyst for the chemical reaction. In E-NAD, it is so positioned that it can hydrogen bond to (and thus when protonated enhance the binding of) a D-hydroxy or a carbonyl group of an inhibitor, but its state of protonation does not affect the binding of L-lactate or propionate. In E-NADH, it is so placed that it can hydrogen bond to both D- and L-hydroxy groups, as well as in carbonyl groups. A chemical mechanism is postulated in which the dehydrogenation of L-alanine by NAD to produce iminopyruvate is followed by attack of water from the same side from which the hydride was removed. The catalytic histidine transfers a proton from the attacking water to the amino group of the resulting carbinolamine and then removes a proton from the hydroxyl group of the carbinolamine as ammonia is eliminated to give pyruvate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grimshaw et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: