Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The relationships between critical power (CP) and anaerobic work capacity (AWC), and the rowing performance in a 2000 m ergometry rowing effort were assessed. Nine male university rowers performed three tests: 1) critical power determination, 2) 2000 m simulated rowing and 3) V university rowers performed three tests: 1) critical power determination, 2) 2000 m simulated university rowers performed three tests: 1) critical power determination, 2) 2000 m simulated O 2 max test. The CP and AWC were determined from the regression between work and time to exhaustion, derived from three exhaustive trials at 70, 60, and 50% of the maximal power. The 2000 m simulated rowing performance was higher for subjects with higher CP independent of AWC. The mean power throughout the 2000 m simulated rowing correlated signifi cantly with CP (r = 0.87) and the absolute V higher CP independent of AWC. The mean power throughout the 2000 m simulated rowing higher CP independent of AWC. The mean power throughout the 2000 m simulated rowing O 2 max (r = 0.71), but not with AWC. CP also infl uenced the pattern of changes in power over the 2000 m simulated rowing. We conclude that the CP is a useful indicator of rowing performance and may be effi cacious for monitoring the training effects in rowing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimoda et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: