Key result
Remote ischemic conditioning reduces erythrocyte aggregation ~8% in acute ischemic stroke but leaves deformability unchanged.
Why the study?
Does remote ischemic conditioning improve RBC deformability and levels of NO and nitrite in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
RCT (n=486)
Sham-controlled
Randomized
Does remote ischemic conditioning improve RBC deformability and levels of NO and nitrite in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remote ischemic conditioning in acute ischemic stroke reduces erythrocyte aggregation rate but does not affect RBC deformability or NO/nitrite levels.
BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a simple and low-cost intervention that is thought to increase collateral blood flow through the vasodilatory effects of nitric oxide (NO) produced by the endothelium and red blood cells (RBCs). This study aims to investigate whether RIC affects RBC deformability and levels of NO and nitrite in patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS: This is a predefined substudy to the RESIST (Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients With Acute Stroke Trial) randomized clinical trial conducted in Denmark. RIC was started in the ambulance and continued at the hospital for seven days. Blood samples were collected at different time points: prehospital in the ambulance, in-hospital upon arrival, 2 hours postadmission, and 24 hours postadmission. RBC deformability and erythrocyte aggregation rate were assessed using ektacytometry, NO using flowcytometry, and nitrite content using ozone chemiluminescence. RESULTS: Of 1500 prehospital randomized patients, 486 patients were included in this study between July 28, 2020, and November 11, 2023, and had blood samples taken. Of these, 249 (51%) had AIS, and here RIC treatment was not associated with increased RBC maximal deformability (RIC, 0.549; sham, 0.548; P =0.31), RBC NO (RIC, 35 301 median fluorescence intensity; sham, 34979 median fluorescence intensity; P =0.89), or nitrite (RIC, 0.036 µmol/L; sham, 0.034 µmol/L; P =0.38), but RIC treatment was associated with a significantly reduced aggregation pressure and a slower erythrocyte aggregation rate (RIC, 323.76 millipascal; sham, 352.74 millipascal; P =0.0113). CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital and in-hospital RIC significantly reduced erythrocyte aggregation rate in patients with acute ischemic stroke, while there was no change in RBC deformability, NO content, or whole blood nitrite levels. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03481777.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blauenfeldt et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Acute Ischemic Stroke (n=486). Remote ischemic conditioning vs. Sham was evaluated on RBC maximal deformability (p=0.31). Remote ischemic conditioning significantly reduced erythrocyte aggregation rate (323.76 vs 352.74 mPa; P=0.0113) but did not change RBC deformability in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: