What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate the efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in improving outcomes for acute ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke.

February 2, 2026Stroke

Abstract WP054: Remote Ischemic Conditioning for the Acute Treatment of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

To evaluate the efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in improving outcomes for acute ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke.
Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Searched databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science
Included studies with RIC initiated within 96 hours of stroke onset
Primary outcomes assessed were modified Rankin Scale and NIH Stroke Scale at specified time-points
Pooled data using fixed and random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed via Cochran’s Q.
32 studies (31 RCTs) included, with 5,580 participants
Significant improvement in mRS and NIHSS scores seen in AIS patients receiving RIC
No significant differences observed in hemorrhagic stroke patients
Improvement in outcomes more pronounced in AIS patients not receiving reperfusion therapies.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Systematic review evaluates remote ischemic conditioning's effect on stroke outcomes, suggesting potential benefits for ischemic stroke.

Lam et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark