Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the regulatory requirement since 2005 for dedicated ECG trials in Phase II to define the cardiac repolarization risk of new therapies.
A compelling assessment of both short- and long-term cardiac safety is increasingly emphasized before regulatory marketing approval. In that context, cardiac adverse effects that were otherwise unexpected become manifest when large numbers of subjects are treated after market approval, many of whom take multiple medications, have co-morbidities, and are subject to other conditions that were not represented in the original clinical trial population. Since 2005, dedicated, robust, and well-controlled electrocardiogram (ECG) trials are required, usually conducted in Phase II, to define the cardiac risk of a new therapy before large-scale Phase III trials are conducted or marketing is approved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joel Morganroth (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: