Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials showed improved overall survival (OS) of advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) patients treated with second-line taxane or irinotecan. However, most data on irinotecan efficacy in this setting come from large Asian trials. We retrospectively analyzed clinical effectiveness and toxicity of irinotecan in a cohort of patients with advanced GEA treated in our department. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to examine the association between clinical and laboratory parameters and survival. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were identified. Median OS was 6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9-7.6]. In multivariate analysis, age < 65 years, baseline total lymphocyte count (TLC) < 1500/µl and presence of peritoneal metastases were associated with shorter OS. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 and included: anemia (52.3%), leukocytopenia (40.9%), neutropenia (59.1%), nausea (25.0%), vomiting (31.8%), diarrhea (31.8%), anorexia (29.5%) and fatigue (43.2%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (6.8%). Nine patients (20.5%) experienced a toxicity grade 3-4 of any kind. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis confirms clinical effectiveness and manageable toxicity of second-line irinotecan in an unselected cohort of advanced GEA patients. Age < 65 years, baseline TLC < 1500/µl and presence of peritoneal metastases were independent prognostic factors associated with shorter OS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ochenduszko et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: