BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Invasive carcinoma is found at histology in 2-5% of colorectal polyps removed under flexible endoscopy. The aim of this study was to confirm that histologically complete endoscopic polypectomy under favorable low-risk conditions is sufficient therapy for pT1 carcinoma, while tumors at or close to the margin of the polypectomy, and histological high-risk criteria, require surgical resection with lymphadenectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with 87 pT1 carcinomas underwent polypectomy within a twelve-and-a-half-year period. Further treatment prospectively followed the above guidelines. The follow-up was documented. RESULTS: A local tumor residue was found in 5 of 34 patients who had undergone surgical resection for doubtful or incomplete polypectomy. Two patients were found to have nodal disease in the surgical specimen, only one of them harboring a high-risk carcinoma. Two further patients with high-risk carcinomas had tumor progression, despite postpolypectomy resections without local tumor residue or lymph-node infiltration, and died. One patient had a local tumor recurrence on follow-up endoscopy eight weeks after doubtfully complete polypectomy. He underwent resection, and had no further recurrence. No further manifestations of invasive carcinoma occurred after complete polypectomy of 42 patients with low-risk carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the view that complete endoscopic polypectomy is an adequate therapy for low-risk carcinoma: A modification of the follow-up regimen, with less frequent endoscopic controls, is justified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hackelsberger et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: