Why the study?
Is abdominal visceral adipose tissue associated with microstructural brain tissue damage in elderly individuals?
Is abdominal visceral adipose tissue associated with microstructural brain tissue damage in elderly individuals?
Increased abdominal visceral adipose tissue, rather than subcutaneous adipose tissue, is independently associated with microstructural brain tissue damage in elderly individuals.
Supports VAT as modifiable factor for brain health in elderly; hypothesis-generating and leaves causality open.
OBJECTIVE: Obesity has been associated with microstructural brain tissue damage. Different fat compartments demonstrate different metabolic and endocrine behaviors. The aim was to investigate the individual associations between abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and microstructural integrity in the brain. METHODS: This study comprised 243 subjects aged 65.4 ± 6.7 years. The associations between abdominal VAT and SAT, assessed by CT, and magnetization transfer imaging markers of brain microstructure for gray and white matter were analyzed and adjusted for confounding factors. RESULTS: VAT was associated with normalized MTR peak height in gray (β -0.216) and white matter (β -0.240) (both P < 0.01) after adjustment for confounding factors. After adjustment for sex, age, and descent, SAT was associated with normalized MTR peak height in gray and white matter, but not after additional correction for BMI, hypertension, current smoking, statin use, and type 2 diabetes (respectively, β -0.055 and β 0.035, both P > 0.05). Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that only VAT was associated with normalized MTR peak height in gray and white matter (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that increased abdominal VAT rather than SAT is associated with microstructural brain tissue damage in elderly individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Widya et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: