Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Contour integral representations of Riemann's Zeta function and Dirichlet's Eta (alternating Zeta) function are presented and investigated. These representations flow naturally from methods developed in the 1800s, but somehow they do not appear in the standard reference summaries, textbooks, or literature. Using these representations as a basis, alternate derivations of known series and integral representations for the Zeta and Eta function are obtained on a unified basis that differs from the textbook approach, and results are developed that appear to be new.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2013 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: