Why the study?
Preclinical PV loop evaluation is often uni-ventricular, but ventricular interdependence and differential pharmacological effects encourage simultaneous evaluation of both ventricles while maintaining cardiopulmonary physiology via a closed-chest approach.
This study provides a detailed, reproducible protocol for closed-chest, bi-ventricular pressure-volume loop recordings in a porcine model, preserving cardiopulmonary physiology.
Simultaneous biventricular PV-loop assessment may refine load-independent measures in animals; leaves open clinical translation.
Pressure-volume (PV) loop recording enables the state-of-the-art investigation of load-independent variables of ventricular performance. Uni-ventricular evaluation is often performed in preclinical research. However, the right and left ventricles exert functional interdependence due to their parallel and serial connections, encouraging simultaneous evaluation of both ventricles. Furthermore, various pharmacological interventions may affect the ventricles and their preloads and afterloads differently. We describe our closed chest approach to admittance-based bi-ventricular PV loop recordings in a porcine model of acute right ventricular (RV) overload. We utilize minimally invasive techniques with all vascular accesses guided by ultrasound. PV catheters are positioned, under fluoroscopic guidance, to avoid thoracotomy in animals, as the closed chest approach maintains the relevant cardiopulmonary physiology. The admittance technology provides real-time PV loop recordings without the need for post-hoc processing. Furthermore, we explain some essential troubleshooting steps during critical timepoints of the presented procedure. The presented protocol is a reproducible and physiologically relevant approach to obtain a bi-ventricular cardiac PV loop recording in a large animal model. This can be applied to a large variety of cardiovascular animal research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyhne et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: