In the field of delinquency many sociologisits have subscribed to the subcultural notion that delinquents share values that are in opposition to the dominant culture; Matza (1964) has alternatively suggested that delinquents and non-delinquents share similar moral prohibitions, but that episodic release from moral constraint (“drift”) allows the delinquents to engage in delinquent behavior. Sixty-nine Ss were asked to report on their involvment in 26 delinquent activities; they were also asked to evaluate each activity along an approval-disapproval continuum. For 13 of the 15 delinquent activities that could be analyzed, those engaging in the act were significantly (p < .05) more approving of the act those not engaging in the act. These findings do not support Matza and call into question the necessity of postulating the notion of drift.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael J. Hindelang (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: