Why the study?
Does bipolar atrial electrogram morphology accurately predict bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block during atrial flutter ablation?
Does bipolar atrial electrogram morphology accurately predict bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block during atrial flutter ablation?
Morphological changes in bipolar atrial electrograms (RS to QR pattern) provide a highly accurate and robust criterion to validate cavotricuspid isthmus conduction block during atrial flutter ablation.
May support BAE morphology to confirm CTI block in flutter ablation; leaves open need for prospective validation.
AIM: Assessment of a bidirectional conduction block within the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is critical during radiofrequency (RF) atrial flutter (AF) ablation. We investigated the use of bipolar atrial electrogram (BAE) morphology as an additional criterion identifying CTI block and tested it against two recognized criteria: differential pacing and reversal of the right atrial depolarization sequence during coronary sinus (CS) pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: An RF ablation procedure was performed during 600 ms CS pacing in 100 consecutive patients with a common AF. BAE recorded along the CTI were continuously monitored. CTI conduction block was achieved by RF ablation in all patients and a clear change in BAE polarity in the Electrogram recorded by the dipoles located on the CTI and immediately lateral to the intended line of block (RS to QR pattern) associated with a confirmed CTI conduction block was observed in all cases. BAE morphology changes predicted bidirectional CTI conduction blocks with a 100% positive and a 100% negative predictive value. At a mean follow-up of 33 +/- 11 months, there was a 5% AF recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that morphological changes in BAE recorded at sites lateral and adjacent to the target line of block may be used as a unique and robust criterion to validate CTI conduction block during AF ablation procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marius Andronache (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: