Meta-analysis reveals L-carnitine improves cardiac function and lowers atrial fibrillation risk after heart surgery, suggesting enhanced perioperative recovery.
Background and Aims: Cardiac surgeries often lead to postoperative complications, which affect recovery and increase morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aims to assess L-carnitine’s effect on preventing postoperative complications across various cardiac surgeries, addressing gaps in current literature on its potential therapeutic benefits. Methods: We systematically searched Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases until March 2025. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.3.2. Effect sizes were measured with relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, while heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic. Results: Thirteen randomised controlled trials(RCTs) with 786 patients were included. L-carnitine significantly increased the cardiac index (CI) (MD: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.20; P < 0.01) and left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) (MD: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.78; P = 0.02). In addition, L-carnitine significantly improved the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD: 7.88; 95% CI: 6.67, 9.09; P < 0.01), with a significant reduction in postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.95; P = 0.03). In contrast, there was no significant reduction in in-hospital mortality (RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.10, 2.63; P = 1.00) and stroke incidence (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.12, 5.76; P = 0.82). Conclusion: Preoperative administration of L-carnitine demonstrates meaningful short-term benefits in enhancing CI, LVSWI, and LVEF while reducing the incidence of POAF following cardiac surgery. These findings suggest a potential role for L-carnitine supplementation in optimising perioperative cardiac care, enhancing recovery, and reducing complications following cardiac surgery. However, the existing studies are limited in scope, making it challenging to draw robust conclusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shalabi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: