Why the study?
Does MDCT provide comparable assessment of left ventricular function and segmental motility compared to MRI in patients with myocardial ischemia?
Does MDCT provide comparable assessment of left ventricular function and segmental motility compared to MRI in patients with myocardial ischemia?
MDCT provides highly comparable measurements of left ventricular global function and severe regional wall motion abnormalities compared to MRI, though MRI is more sensitive for detecting mild hypokinesia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports MDCT as a reliable alternative for assessing global LV function; leaves open its.
Data assimilated for coronary arteries angiography by MDCT with retrospective (ECG) gating could be used for LV function without the need to repeat examination. Is to study left ventricular segmental motility and global function using MDCT compared to MRI. Fifty patients had cardiac MDCT and MRI studies within the same hour. LVEDV and LVESV volumes were measured. Consequently, the (EF) was calculated, for wall motion analysis, cine loops evaluated by two radiologists. Excellent correlation between MDCT and MRI for the measurement of EDV (r2 = 0.962; p < 0.001), and ESV (r2 = 0.988; p < 0.001). Evaluation of EF revealed a good correlation between MDCT and MRI (r2 = 0.984; p < 0.001) all by linear regression analysis. All the cardiac segments that shows dyskinesia or akinesia showed agreement between MDCT and MRI in cine images, the only disagreement in cases of mild hypokinesia detected only by MRI. High agreement between MDCT and MRI in the study of left ventricular segmental motility and global function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sami et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: