Why the study?
Does 16-detector row CT accurately assess global and regional left ventricular function compared to echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance?
Does 16-detector row CT accurately assess global and regional left ventricular function compared to echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance?
16-detector row CT provides accurate assessment of global and regional left ventricular function comparable to echocardiography and CMR, allowing simultaneous functional evaluation during routine CT angiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MDCT may enable concurrent LV function assessment during coronary CTA; leaves open prospective outcome validation before routine adoption.
AIMS: To compare multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) global and regional left ventricular (LV) function assessment with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 25 patients, who were referred for noninvasive angiography with 16-detector row CT, LV function assessment was also performed. A subsequent echocardiogram was performed, and in a subgroup of patients, CMR examination was completed to evaluate LV function. For global function assessment, the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated. Regional LV function was scored using a 17-segment model and a 4-point scoring system. MDCT agreed well with echocardiography for the assessment of LVEF (r=0.96; bias 0.54%; p<0.0001) and regional LV function (kappa=0.78). Eight patients had no contra-indications and gave informed consent for CMR examination. A fair correlation between MDCT and CMR was demonstrated in the assessment of LVEF (r=0.86; bias -1.5%; p<0.01). Regional LV function agreement between MDCT and CMR was good (kappa=0.86). CONCLUSION: MDCT agreed well with both echocardiography and CMR in the assessment of global and regional LV function. Global and regional LV function may accurately be evaluated by 16-detector row CT, and can be added to a routine CT image analysis protocol without need for additional contrast or imaging time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salm et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: