Why the study?
Does a low cumulative dose of epirubicin cause chronic cardiac damage in breast cancer patients?
Does a low cumulative dose of epirubicin cause chronic cardiac damage in breast cancer patients?
This study investigates the long-term cardiotoxic effects of low-dose epirubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer survivors.
Surveillance for cardiotoxicity should not change based on this study alone; hypothesis-generating for long-term effects of low-dose epirubicin in survivors.
Breast cancer patients who present with only locoregional lymphatic metastases have good life expectancy after treatment with surgery and adjuvant anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. Anthracyclines, however, can induce cardiomyopathy, and this may become clinically manifest as chronic heart failure many years after exposure.1 As the occurrence of this side effect is dependent on the cumulative dose given, breast cancer patients with a favourable prognosis are treated with rather low doses of anthracyclines in order to prevent severe cardiac damage. We investigated 56 breast cancer patients in a cross sectional design, to determine whether a low cumulative dose of the anthracyline compound epirubicin causes chronic cardiac damage. The patients were two or more years after treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC). The chemotherapy had been given after mastectomy or after breast conserving treatment, and was followed by locoregional radiotherapy (40 to 50 Gy). Thirty patients had been treated with five cycles of FEC (total cumulative dose of epirubicin, 450 mg/m2). Twenty six patients had received four cycles of FEC (total cumulative dose of epirubicin, 360 mg/m2), followed by high dose combination chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with haematopoietic stem cell rescue. Their median age at the time of cardiac evaluation …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M.T. Meinardi (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: