Observational study reveals higher enteric pathogen diversity in soil near waste bins in non-sewered areas, highlighting soil testing as an alternative surveillance tool.
Wastewater surveillance has been widely adopted since the COVID-19 pandemic, but non-sewered or onsite sanitation is a common form of sanitation in cities of low- and middle-income countries. Environmental surveillance in these settings requires expanding analyses beyond wastewater. We collected 81 soil samples adjacent to public waste bins inside the sewered and non-sewered areas of Maputo and a 150-meter-wide buffer zone between the two areas, as well as from subsistence farms near the wastewater treatment plant for comparison. We cultured Escherichia coli ( E. coli) using the IDEXX Quanti-Tray/2000 system and determined the prevalence of 29 unique enteric pathogens via RT-qPCR on TaqMan array cards. E. coli concentrations were significantly higher (p<.001) in soils adjacent to public waste bins (mean = 5.05×10 5 per gram) compared to soils from farms (mean = 8.70×10 1 per gram). The mean number of unique pathogens was higher in soils from the non-sewered area (mean = 7.9, n=32) and the 150-meter buffer area (mean = 10.5, n=10) compared to the sewered area (mean = 4.6, n=20) and soils from farms (mean=3.8, n=19). Findings demonstrate that the presence of enteric pathogens in soils adjacent to public waste bins were associated with neighborhood sanitation infrastructure and may be a useful matrix for surveillance. In high-burden settings with poor sanitation, direct examination of soils and other environmental matrices are potentially scalable means of environmental pathogen surveillance to consider beyond conventional sampling matrices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: