Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Monte Carlo simulation shows angular distributions of secondary radiation across 70–250 MeV proton beams, highlighting key parameters for radiation shielding and stray dose protection.
Monte Carlo simulation of secondary neutron and photon dosimetry -specifically the ambient dose equivalent H*(10) -is central to radiation protection in pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. We report Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) version 3.35 calculations of H*(10) for proton beams from 70 to 250 MeV incident on a water phantom representative of the Ion Beam Applications (IBA) Blue Phantom, scored at 11 emission angles at 80 cm using International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 74 fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients. Results are normalised to peak absorbed dose, yielding the quantity H*(10)/D [nSv Gy-1] relevant to facility shielding andpatient out-of-field dose estimation. The distal Bragg-peak range R80 was benchmarked against independent Geant4/Gate calculations, agreeing within -0.56% to -3.61% and meeting the ±3% clinical criterion for energies ≥ 100 MeV. Enabling the low-energy neutron eventgenerator mode changed secondary-neutron yields by less than 0.2%, indicating that default settings are adequate for these radiation-protection estimates. The H*(10)/D angular distribution showed a forward maximum near 40° and a backward maximum at 180°; the forward-to-lateral ratio H*(40°)/H*(90°) rose from 1.1 at 70 MeV to 2.5 at 250 MeV -the forward peak becoming the global maximum above 150 MeV -while neutrons exceeded photons at 90° by factors of 22.9-56.2. A representative PBS nozzle model was added to quantify the effect of beam-line components; the simulated forward energy dependence and neutron spectral composition agree with published pencil-beam-scanning measurements, while absolute magnitudes remain lower owing to the single-pencil bare-phantom geometry. For a 150 MeV spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), H*(10)/D was 4.8-6.2× higher than the monoenergetic beam, reflecting the larger number of protons required per unit dose. The dosenormalised dataset provides a systematic, practical reference for PHITS users in proton therapy radiation protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huynh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: