Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study finds higher graft survival in gene-positive pediatric kidney transplant recipients, indicating potential utility for pre-transplant genetic testing.
To determine whether genetic etiology, as determined by whole-exome sequencing (WES) and copy-number variant (CNV) analysis, is associated with graft survival and early injury profiles in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of children (< 18 years) who underwent primary kidney transplantation between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2024, and had available WES. Genomic variants were interpreted according to ACMG/AMP standards with integrated intragenic-CNV interrogation and multidisciplinary review. Recipients were classified as gene-positive (pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants or clinically concordant variants of uncertain significance in established kidney-disease genes) or gene-negative (no highly suspicious variants). The primary clinical outcome was graft survival. Secondary outcomes included kidney function (serum creatinine and eGFR), urinary biomarkers at 6 months post-transplantation, and serial measurements every 6 months through year 3. Among 110 recipients (60.0% male; median age at transplant 12.7 years; median follow-up 29.4 months), the gene-positivity rate was 56.4%. The most frequently altered genes were COL4A5 ( n = 8), WT1 ( n = 8), and NPHP3 ( n = 7); NPHP1 alterations were predominantly multi-exon deletions. Complement-pathway variants ( CFHR3 , CFHR5 ) were identified in two recipients. Of the 98 recipients included in prognostic analyses, graft survival was higher in the gene-positive group than in the gene-negative group (97.6% vs. 85.5%; log-rank P = 0.049, HR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03–0.78). At 6 months post-transplantation, mean eGFR was slightly lower in the gene-positive group but remained within expected pediatric allograft ranges. All instances of markedly elevated urinary microalbumin (> 600 mg/L) occurred in the gene-negative group, and dipstick proteinuria was less frequent in gene-positive recipients; urine occult blood did not differ between groups. In this exploratory analysis, genetic etiology classification using WES with intragenic CNV analysis was associated with a trend toward higher graft survival and early proteinuria differences that were suggestive but not sustained, warranting cautious interpretation and further validation. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest that, once validated, pre-transplant genetic testing might help guide genotype-informed counseling, individualized surveillance intensity, and targeted living donor evaluation. However, due to the small number of graft loss events ( n = 6) and extreme microalbumin outliers ( n = 4), larger prospective studies are needed to determine the potential value of pre-transplant genetic testing before clinical implementation in pediatric kidney transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: