Perspective framework outlines strategies to enhance antimicrobial reasoning in preclinical medical students, indicating early integration of stewardship improves readiness for clinical practice.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is usually addressed through surveillance, prescribing policy, stewardship programs, infection prevention, and drug development. Less attention is given to an earlier educational question: how future doctors first learn to connect microorganisms, antibiotics, and resistance. In some preclinical medical curricula, microbiology provides essential knowledge of microbial structure, virulence, antimicrobial mechanisms, laboratory diagnosis, and resistance pathways, but opportunities to use this knowledge for antimicrobial reasoning may be limited. Students may therefore recall resistance mechanisms yet remain less prepared to interpret culture and susceptibility reports, consider local resistance patterns, or explain when therapy should be escalated, narrowed, optimized, or discontinued. This Perspective argues that AMR education should begin before students prescribe. Preclinical microbiology should preserve its scientific foundation while more deliberately linking microbial mechanisms to clinical scenarios, stewardship principles, microbiology report interpretation, and assessment design. Implementation should be adapted to local standards, supported by faculty development, and evaluated prospectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Razique Anwer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: