Why the study?
Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease remains suboptimal, and few existing digital tools provide comprehensive, closed-loop management of multidimensional risk factors without increasing clinician workload.
Does an AI-enhanced management system improve LDL-C levels in adults with coronary heart disease?
RCT (n=1,100)
Open-label
1:1
No
Does an AI-enhanced management system improve LDL-C levels in adults with coronary heart disease?
Mean Difference: -3.2 (95% CI -6.2–-0.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 60.4% vs 63.7%
p-value: p=0.03
An AI-enhanced smartphone management system significantly improved short-term LDL-C and blood pressure control in patients with coronary heart disease compared to usual care.
Supports AI app integration for LDL-C control in CHD; extends RCT evidence on digital tools for secondary prevention.
Background Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) remains suboptimal due to fragmented care and therapeutic inertia. While digital health interventions offer a promising strategy, few existing tools provide comprehensive, closed-loop management of multidimensional risk factors without increasing clinician workload. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI)–enhanced management system (AIM-CHD) in improving multidimensional risk factor control among patients with CHD. Methods This single-center, open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial was conducted from November 2024 to June 2025 in China. A total of 1100 adults with confirmed CHD were randomized 1:1 to receive either the AIM-CHD intervention ( n = 549) or usual care ( n = 551) for 3 months. The AIM-CHD system featured automated multi-source data capture, guideline-directed risk stratification, and closed-loop feedback via smartphone. The primary outcome was the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included goal attainment rates for LDL-C (< 70 mg/dL) and blood pressure (BP, < 130/80 mm Hg), glycated hemoglobin, smoking cessation, body mass index (BMI), medication adherence, and a composite cardiovascular endpoint at 3 months. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. Results Of 1100 randomized participants (mean age 61 years; 75.3% male), 943 (85.7%) completed the 3-month follow-up. The intervention group achieved a significantly lower mean LDL-C level compared with the control group (60.4 ± 23.4 vs. 63.7 ± 26.0 mg/dL), with an adjusted mean difference of − 3.2 mg/dL (95% CI, − 6.2 to − 0.3; p = 0.03). Furthermore, participants in the intervention group were more likely to achieve the LDL-C target (71% vs. 64%; RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01–1.20; p = 0.03) and the BP target (45% vs. 35%; RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09–1.48; p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed for HbA1c, BMI, or medication adherence. Conclusions The AIM-CHD system significantly improved short-term lipid and BP control compared with usual care. These findings support interoperable, low-burden digital management systems as a scalable strategy in routine secondary prevention. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06686056. Registered on 11 November 2024.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ba et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=1,100). AIM-CHD system (artificial intelligence-enhanced management system) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level at 3 months (AMD -3.2 mg/dL, 95% CI -6.2 to -0.3, p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: