Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Algorithm evaluation shows adaptive Wasserstein loss improves defect detection in pipeline coating images, suggesting enhanced visual screening for complex target morphologies.
Ensuring the integrity of external anti-corrosion coatings is critical to the safe operation of long-distance oil and gas pipelines. Construction-site images contain complex backgrounds, multi-scale targets, and many elongated or weak-boundary coating conditions, challenging conventional bounding-box regression under low-overlap conditions. We constructed a real-site dataset of 1388 images and 1756 annotated instances across six coating-condition categories from long-distance natural-gas pipeline construction sites. Building on YOLOv10n, we formulate a Scale–Aspect Adaptive Normalized Wasserstein Distance (SA-NWD) regression strategy that adjusts the NWD weight according to target scale and aspect ratio during training. Across six random seeds, SA-NWD achieved the highest mean Recall (0.459 vs. 0.437 baseline) and mAP@0.5 (0.451 vs. 0.431), whereas fixed-weight NWD achieved the highest mean mAP@0.5:0.95 (0.251 vs. 0.240 baseline). Ablation results support complementary scale and aspect-ratio guidance. Morphology-grouped analysis showed higher Recall for extremely elongated targets (0.714 vs. 0.659 for fixed-weight NWD), with lower cross-seed standard deviation (±0.027 vs. ±0.101). These results suggest that SA-NWD may benefit high-recall screening of morphologically complex coating conditions, while fixed-weight NWD may provide more stable high-IoU localization; both strategies retain the inference architecture, parameter count, and GFLOPs of the YOLOv10n baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: