Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study demonstrates a strong association between perceived cognitive constructivist pedagogy and student research competence, indicating its utility for scientific education.
This study examined the perceived association between a cognitive constructivist program (CCP) and research competence (RC) among first-cycle university students in Lambayeque, Peru. Using a quantitative, nonexperimental, cross-sectional, descriptive design, a validated Likert-type questionnaire was administered to 149 purposively selected students, who evaluated four RC dimensions: conceptual, epistemological, methodological, and attitudinal. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) confirmed adequate psychometric properties (factor loadings > 0.70, average variance extracted (AVE) > 0.50, composite reliability > 0.70). The structural model revealed that perceived CCP accounts for 52.6% of the variance in RC (R² = 0.526) and is significantly associated with all dimensions: conceptual (β = 0.487, p < 0.001), epistemological (β = 0.538, p < 0.001), methodological (β = 0.612, p < 0.001), and attitudinal (β = 0.453, p < 0.001). Effect sizes (f²) ranged from 0.258 to 0.601. The methodological dimension showed the strongest association. The CCP represents a viable pedagogical framework whose perceived application is associated with stronger RC, contributing to SDG 4, target 4.7.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnny Antonio Marín León (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: