Analytical method evaluation reveals complementary quantification and degradation tracking in cetuximab antibody-drug conjugates, indicating improved quality control for complex biologics.
Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are structurally complex biopharmaceuticals whose quantitative characterization is often complicated by payload-related interferences and molecular heterogeneity. In this study, two complementary chromatographic methods based on reverse-phase ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-UHPLC) and size-exclusion ultra-performance liquid chromatography (SEC-UHPLC) coupled with diode array detection were developed and comparatively evaluated for quantitative and integrity assessment of Cetuximab (CET) in ADC formulations. The RP-UHPLC method, developed on a C8 stationary phase under denaturing conditions, showed linearity over the range 0.05–5 mg/mL (R2 = 0.9979), with LOD and LOQ values of 10 and 40 μg/mL, respectively. The SEC-UHPLC method, optimized under native conditions on a Yarra SEC-3000 column, exhibited linearity within the 0.5–5 mg/mL range (R2 = 0.9998), with LOD and LOQ values of 17 and 52 μg/mL, respectively. Both methods showed satisfactory accuracy, precision, and robustness according to a fit-for-purpose validation approach. Application to CET-based ADCs bearing different aminobisphosphonate payloads confirmed reliable quantification. RP-UHPLC enabled sensitive determination of antibody concentration, whereas SEC-UHPLC enabled assessment of monomeric integrity and sample heterogeneity under native conditions. Comparative analysis of aged ADC samples demonstrated that SEC-UHPLC revealed loss of structural integrity and sample heterogeneity that were not detectable by RP-UHPLC or direct UV spectrophotometry. The combined RP-UHPLC/SEC-UHPLC workflow provides a robust, accessible, and complementary platform for routine quantitative analysis and integrity assessment of ADC formulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cuffaro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: