Empirical analysis uncovers a dominance of machine learning classification across 335 European social initiatives, highlighting the need for balanced data science curricula.
This study provides an innovative approach to identify the relevant competence profiles that data science education should promote for work in the social domain. We assess the supply side of European Data Science for Good (DSG) initiatives and analyse 335 projects. Based on project documentation, we identify 146 distinct data science methods and develop a taxonomy that distinguishes between statistical and machine learning approaches and classifies methods according to the scale of the target variables (nominal, ordinal, metric). The results show a strong dominance of machine learning, particularly in classification-oriented problem settings, alongside a substantial role for exploratory and descriptive analysis in evaluation tasks. Drawing on these patterns, we provide a discussion on the implications for curriculum design of higher education programmes in social data science and artificial intelligence, arguing for an educational profile that aligns advanced methodological skills in machine learning with solid statistical literacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: