Case report reveals failed neuromuscular blockade following accidental pre-administration of sugammadex in electroconvulsive therapy, highlighting the need for structural safeguards.
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) performed with rocuronium-sugammadex requires both agents to be prepared before each session, creating a persistent syringe-swap risk that compounds with repetition. A 48-year-old woman scheduled for her sixth ECT session received sugammadex 200 mg instead of rocuronium due to syringe misidentification driven by task automaticity accumulated over 5 uneventful preceding sessions. Because the entire sugammadex dose remained unbound in plasma (a state we term “zero-complexation”), subsequently administered rocuronium 100 mg (1.41 mg/kg) failed to achieve adequate neuromuscular blockade. This scenario is pharmacokinetically distinct from the well-described post-reversal re-dosing situation: 200 mg of free sugammadex sequesters ~56 mg of rocuronium, leaving an insufficient effective dose regardless of the total amount administered. The session was postponed and completed the following day uneventfully with standard-dose rocuronium. We present a management algorithm and a safety checklist designed for the repeated-session context of ECT. This case demonstrates that anesthetic teams using rocuronium-sugammadex for ECT must recognize the cumulative automaticity risk inherent in serial sessions and implement structural safeguards accordingly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanaral et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: