Practice-based study demonstrates marked improvements in curricular recall and physical concentration tasks among young pupils, highlighting puppetry as an engaging educational medium.
This article develops, in research-article form, the empirical and methodological contribution of a doctoral investigation intopuppetry as an educational tool for children in early childhood and primary education. The dissertation was designed arounda qualitative research orientation and combined a review of the scientific literature, fieldwork, participant observation,interviews, participatory workshops, and analysis of the resulting observations and educational activities. The present articleintegrates three complementary empirical cases reported in the dissertation: the educational puppet performance Un viajeinvisible; a collaborative shadow-puppetry workshop on the solar system with 46 eight-year-old pupils; and a creative-puppet workshop on concentration with 110 children aged four to eight. The cases represent three different relationshipsbetween child and puppet: reception of a completed educational performance, collaborative construction and manipulationof puppets for curricular learning, and construction and animation of a puppet inside a dramatic game. In the solar-systemworkshop, the dissertation reports an increase in correct responses from approximately 20% before the workshop toapproximately 95% afterward. Recalculation from the six item-level tables gives 24.75% and 95.67%, respectively. In theconcentration workshop, successful rope crossing increased from 47 of 110 children (42.7%) before the puppet game to 82of 110 (74.5%) while children manipulated their self-made puppets and carried a stone. The article interprets these findingsas descriptive, practice-based evidence. It does not claim a causal “puppet effect”, because the original interventions did notuse randomized controls and several components—storytelling, construction, rehearsal, movement, peer interaction andreflection—operated simultaneously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hossein Hossein Zeinali (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: