Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical review reveals methodological limitations in experimental media humor research, indicating a need for refined stimulus manipulation and theoretical grounding.
Humor has long been of interest to media effects scholars. As meta-analyses and systematic reviews accumulate, there is a need to continue scrutinizing the means of knowledge production. The purpose of this review was to investigate how humor was examined in experimental media effects research. In particular, we focused on how humor stimuli were constructed and how humor responses were measured. Based on a review of 47 published articles, we concluded that most studies examined herein did not manipulate humor message attributes, but rather employed a simple comparison between a piece of humorous content against a piece of non-humor content. Additionally, while most of the studies were guided by theory, only a minority of them included a humor theory; most of the studies used a measure of perceived humor for the manipulation check; the majority of studies used the humor response variable solely for the manipulation check; and only a few studies used the humor measure as a dependent variable. Recommendations are advanced to continue refining our understanding of the effects of humor in the media.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miczo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: