Conceptual essay reveals how prolonged silence in psychoanalysis reflects foundational social abandonment, indicating deep vulnerabilities linking individual subjects to collective trauma.
Sometime during my second analysis, I fell silent. This silence lasted, with intermissions, for a period of 2 years. In this essay, I explore this silence as the effect of an encounter with a psycho-social threshold. I lean on Ferenczi’s unwelcome child and his death instinct, on Green’s “dead mother” and on Laplanche’s enigmatic signifier. I think through Schmitt’s “state of exception,” Agamben’s homo sacer, Girard’s scapegoat, and the biblical stories of Isaac and Ishmael. I argue that the relations between subjects and collectives are structured by an unconscious knowledge of the abandonment, sacrifice and exile at the foundation and horizon of human community; hence their inherent vulnerability and unease. I suggest that my very private silence was an inability to articulate and share my version of this fundamental vulnerability and unease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eyal Rozmarin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: