Why the study?
Do psychosocial interventions improve outcomes in patients undergoing rehabilitation and secondary prevention for coronary heart disease?
Do psychosocial interventions improve outcomes in patients undergoing rehabilitation and secondary prevention for coronary heart disease?
Psychosocial factors such as depression, anxiety, and social isolation are important risk factors in CHD, and psychosocial interventions should be integrated into cardiac rehabilitation.
May support integrating psychosocial care into CHD rehab; leaves open need for confirmatory RCTs.
Lifestyle and behavioral factors play a major part in the development of coronary heart disease (CHD). Rehabilitation and secondary prevention of CHD must likewise consider behavioral and lifestyle change as adjuncts to other therapies. Principal among the psychosocial factors are depression, anxiety and anger/hostility. Related to these negative emotions, a distressed personality style (type-D) in which both negative emotion and social inhibition are present represents a psychosocial risk factor. In addition, social experience, both in the resources available through social networks and the subjective experience of isolation, is related to both the onset and course of CHD. Psychosocial interventions have been found to be effective in rehabilitation and secondary prevention. Finally, a case is made that all professionals working in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention should be knowledgeable in the psychological constructs of motivation and readiness for behavioral change. The widely employed transtheoretical model of change is presented as an example of the need for interventions to be developed that recognize patients' difference in the readiness for change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bryan P. McCormick (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: