Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Long-span road–rail steel truss bridges require support-level vibration mitigation without compromising bridge serviceability, train-running safety and comfort, or environmental vibration control. This entirely numerical study establishes coordinated vehicle–bridge interaction (VBI) and vehicle–bridge–soil models for the Wuchang-side 8×100 m continuous steel truss approach bridge of the Baishazhou road–rail Yangtze River Bridge. Ordinary steel bearing and anti-vibration spherical steel bearing (AVSSB) schemes are compared under the same track irregularity, train speeds, and one-to-four-line operating cases. Finite AVSSB vertical stiffness produces only limited modal shifts, reduces the impact coefficient by up to 4.4%, and reduces the selected pier lateral acceleration by up to 13.7%, without a discernible deterioration in the derailment coefficient, wheel-load reduction ratio, carbody acceleration, or Sperling comfort index at the reported precision. Frequency selectivity is important in engineering terms because reducing a narrow medium- or high-frequency component does not necessarily reduce the low-frequency-dominated overall ground vibration index. The practical contribution is therefore a system-level screening procedure; an AVSSB may be adopted as a dynamically compatible support modification when selective structural vibration reduction is required, but the speed and multi-line operating scenarios must still be checked independently for environmental vibration compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: