SnO 2 ‐based catalysts modified by La, Ce, and Y with a Sn/Ln (Ln=La, Ce, Y) atomic ratio of 2:1 were prepared by using a co‐precipitation method and used for CO and CH 4 oxidation. The catalysts were characterized by N 2 adsorption–desorption, XRD, energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS)‐SEM, H 2 temperature‐programmed reduction (TPR), X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and thermogravimetric analysis differential scanning calorimetry (TGA‐DSC) techniques. All three rare earth metal oxides were found to improve the thermal stability of SnO 2 , which resulted in catalysts with much higher surface areas and smaller crystallite and particle sizes. However, only the addition of Ce resulted in a catalyst with improved activity for both CO and CH 4 oxidation. In contrast, La and Y modification resulted in samples with decreased activity for both reactions. For the Ce‐modified sample, Ce cations were found to dope into the lattice of rutile SnO 2 to form a solid‐solution structure. As a lattice impurity, ceria, the well‐known oxygen storage component (OSC), led to the formation of more defects in the matrix of SnO 2 and impeded the crystallization process, which resulted in a catalyst with a higher surface area and more active oxygen species. In contrast, XRD proved that the addition of La and Y mainly led to the formation of more stable and inert pyrochlore compounds, Sn 2 La 2 O 7 and Sn 2 Y 2 O 7 , which disrupted a major part of the active sites based on SnO 2 . Consequently, the oxidation activity was impaired, although these two samples also have higher surface areas than pure SnO 2 . The Ce‐modified sample showed not only high activity but also good reaction durability and thermal stability. Furthermore, Sn‐Ce binary oxide is a better support than SnO 2 , CeO 2 , and traditional Al 2 O 3 supports for Pd, which gives it the potential to be applied in some real after‐treatment applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: