Why the study?
Does on-line hemodiafiltration improve cardiovascular surrogate markers compared to conventional hemodialysis in patients undergoing hemodialysis?
Does on-line hemodiafiltration improve cardiovascular surrogate markers compared to conventional hemodialysis in patients undergoing hemodialysis?
On-line hemodiafiltration may offer cardiovascular protective effects by improving left ventricular mass index and preventing the worsening of arterial stiffness and diastolic function compared to conventional hemodialysis.
May support on-line HDF over conventional HD to regress LVMI and preserve diastolic function; extends RCT evidence on CV surrogates in hemodialysis.
Atherosclerotic complications have a significant effect on mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) therapy. However, anti-atherosclerotic and cardioprotective effects of on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) remain to be elucidated. We prospectively compared the anti-atherosclerotic and cardioprotective effects in two randomly divided groups, i.e. on-line HDF group (n = 13) and conventional HD group (n = 9) for 1 year. Surrogate markers were brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), intima-media thickness (IMT) of carotid artery as an atherosclerosis marker, and cardiac functional surrogate markers included left ventricular mass index (LVMI), ejection fraction (EF), and LV diastolic capacity represented as E/A and deceleration time (DT). LVMI in on-line HDF patients showed significant regression after 1 year of treatment (131.9 ± 25.8 to 116.5 ± 24.7 g/m(2), P = 0.03), while LVMI in HD patients did not show any significant change (148.0 ± 47.1 to 142.3 ± 35.5 g/m(2)). Levels of baPWV in HD patients showed a significant increase (11.4%) from basal levels, while on-line HDF groups showed no significant increase. Furthermore, HD patients showed significant worsening of LV diastolic capacity (E/A: from 0.87 ± 0.12 to 0.79 ± 0.08, P = 0.03), while it was not shown in on-line HDF patients. Ejection fraction and IMT did not show any significant change in both groups. Serum albumin, C-reactive protein, β2 microglobulin, blood pressure, and anti-hypertensive drug use did not change in both groups. On-line HDF showed a significant improvement in LVMI and prevented a significant worsening of baPWV or LV diastolic capacity compared with patients on conventional HD therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohtake et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: