Why the study?
Does an independently navigated PSIR (INPSIR) sequence improve motion compensation compared to standard 3D PSIR for imaging myocardial infarctions?
Does an independently navigated PSIR (INPSIR) sequence improve motion compensation compared to standard 3D PSIR for imaging myocardial infarctions?
The proposed INPSIR sequence introduces a separate respiratory navigator to potentially improve motion compensation in 3D imaging of myocardial infarctions.
INPSIR may improve motion compensation in 3D myocardial infarction imaging; leaves open prospective validation versus standard PSIR.
The distribution of viable and infarcted myocardium is typically visualized using inversion recovery (IR) late gadolinium enhancement (1) or phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) sequences (2). Transitioning PSIR from breath-hold 2D to respiratory navigator-gated 3D imaging promises higher SNR and CNR, and whole heart coverage (3,4). However, the optimal method for motion compensation with 3D PSIR is undetermined. With standard PSIR, the IR-prepared volume (first heartbeat) is corrected with the phase from the reference volume (second heartbeat), (Fig 1a ). Current implementations of respiratory navigated 3D PSIR accept data for the reference based solely on navigator NAV1, which takes place over a heartbeat in advance. Respiratory motion occuring between NAV1 and reference volume acquisition, potentially corrupts reference image quality and may compromise the PSIR image. We propose an independently navigated PSIR (INPSIR) sequence with a separate navigator, NAV2, dedicated to motion compensation of the reference volume (Fig 1b ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: