Objective: To restore the normal barriers protecting the intracranial structures and obtain a permanent or very durable reconstruction. Methods: This retrospective study spanning 3 years included 36 patients who underwent reconstruction of skull defects either with autologous bone or with 3-dimensional (3D) titanium mesh. To analyze difference of both, 2 groups (group A 1 group skull defect for reconstruction with 3D titanium mesh, group B the other group with autologous bone) were divided. Results: A favorable surgery outcome was attained in the follow-up without complications in the group B. Osteolysis was not observed from 3D reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) from 3D reconstruction of CT in the group B (P>0.05). Complications was significantly different, comparing with group A (P<0.05). General features (age, follow-up) were not different (P>0.05). Conclusion: Autologous bone for the reconstruction of skull defects seems to be good technique for permanent or very durable reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: