Key result
Open access surgery for elective colon cancer was associated with higher rates of major complications (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.22-2.29; p=0.002) and 30-day mortality compared to laparoscopic surgery.
Why the study?
Does open access surgery compared to laparoscopic resection affect short-term major complications and mortality in patients undergoing elective colon cancer surgery?
Observational (n=1,812)
Yes
Does open access surgery compared to laparoscopic resection affect short-term major complications and mortality in patients undergoing elective colon cancer surgery?
Odds Ratio: 1.67 (95% CI 1.22–2.29)
p-value: p=0.002
Elective colon cancer surgery in Norway has a low complication burden, but open access surgery is associated with worse short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic approaches.
Supports laparoscopic preference in elective colon cancer; leaves open causal confirmation by RCTs.
BACKGROUND: To describe the real burden of major complications after elective surgery for colon cancer in Norway, and to assess which predictors that are significantly associated with the short-term outcome. METHODS: An observational, multi-centre analysis of prospectively registered colon resections registered into the Norwegian Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery, NoRGast, between January 2014 and December 2016. A propensity score-adjusted subgroup analysis for surgical access groups was attempted, with laparoscopic resections grouped as intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Out of 1812 resections, 14.0% of patients experienced a major complication within 30 days following surgery. The over-all reoperation rate was 8.7%, and rate of reoperation for anastomotic leak was 3.8%. Twenty patients (1.1%) died within 30 days after surgery. Higher age was not a significant predictor of major complications, including 30-day mortality. After correction for all co-variables, open access surgery was associated with higher rates of major complications (OR 1.67 (CI 1.22-2.29), p = 0.002), higher 30-day mortality (OR 4.39 (CI 1.19-16.13) p = 0.026) and longer length-of-stay (HR 0.58 (CI 0.52-0.65) p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a low complication burden and high rate of uneventful patient journeys after elective surgery for colon cancer in Norway. Age was not associated with higher morbidity or mortality rates. Open access surgery was associated with an inferior short-term outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nymo et al. (2018) conducted an observational in colon cancer (n=1,812). Open access surgery vs. Laparoscopic surgery was evaluated on major complications within 30 days (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.22-2.29, p=0.002). Open access surgery for elective colon cancer was associated with higher rates of major complications (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.22-2.29; p=0.002) and 30-day mortality compared to laparoscopic surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: