Key result
Guanfacine extended release was associated with significantly lower discontinuation rates in the second year compared to atypical antipsychotics (22.0% vs. 35.9%; p=0.03).
Why the study?
To assess treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and health care costs associated with atypical antipsychotics or guanfacine extended release after stimulant therapy for ADHD.
Does guanfacine extended release compared to atypical antipsychotics improve treatment persistence and reduce healthcare costs in children and adolescents with ADHD after stimulant therapy?
Cohort (n=1,327)
Does guanfacine extended release compared to atypical antipsychotics improve treatment persistence and reduce healthcare costs in children and adolescents with ADHD after stimulant therapy?
In children and adolescents with ADHD, guanfacine extended release showed better long-term treatment persistence compared to atypical antipsychotics, with similar overall healthcare costs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support guanfacine ER preference for tolerability in youth; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Objective: To assess treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and health care costs associated with use of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) or the nonstimulant guanfacine extended release (GXR) after stimulant therapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In Canada, GXR is approved as a monotherapy for children and adolescents with ADHD or as an adjunct to stimulants, and AAPs are commonly used off-label as an adjunct to stimulants. Methods: Health care claims data (January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2016) from Quebec's provincial health plan were assessed for individuals with ADHD, 6–17 years of age, who received ≥1 stimulant followed by a first AAP or GXR prescription (index medication), without a diagnosis for which AAPs are indicated. Results: Overall, 1327 individuals were included (AAPs, 1098; GXR, 229). Rates of discontinuation, augmentation, or switching of the index medication did not differ between AAPs and GXR during the first follow-up year. Discontinuation rates were significantly lower with GXR than with AAPs during the second year (22.0% vs. 35.9%; p = 0.03). GXR and AAPs resulted in similar increases in total health care cost. In GXR users, the increase in prescription drug cost after 6 months was higher than in AAP users, whereas the increase in overall medical cost was higher with AAPs than GXR, owing to more psychiatric department visits. Conclusions: In children and adolescents with ADHD who used AAPs or GXR after stimulants, secondary treatment changes were similar with both treatments after 1 year, but discontinuation rates were significantly lower with GXR than with AAPs in the second year. The greater increase in prescription cost with GXR was balanced by a greater increase in overall medical costs with AAPs, resulting in no overall difference in total health care cost between the two treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lachaîne et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (n=1,327). Guanfacine extended release (GXR) vs. Atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) was evaluated on Discontinuation rates during the second year (p=0.03). Guanfacine extended release was associated with significantly lower discontinuation rates in the second year compared to atypical antipsychotics (22.0% vs. 35.9%; p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: