Kinematic modeling reveals wave advection shifts spectral energy across frequencies in coastal flows, indicating corrections are needed when orbital velocity exceeds current speed.
Assigning a physical interpretation to turbulent fluctuations beneath waves is complex because eddies are advected by unsteady wave orbital motion. Here, the kinematic effects of wave orbital motion on turbulent fluctuations at a fixed location were investigated using model turbulence spatial spectra ( κ spectra) together with a general form of the frozen turbulence approximation. Model autospectra and cospectra included an inertial subrange, a rolloff at energy-containing scales ( L = 2 π / κ 0 ), and a dissipation range. Turbulence was advected by a background flow composed of waves (rms orbital velocity σ w , peak frequency ω w , and spectral width Δ ω w ) propagating parallel to a current u c . Expressions were derived for turbulence frequency spectra ( ω spectra), and parameters were varied across ranges typical in the coastal ocean. Except close to the wave band, the ω -spectrum shape collapses with two dimensionless parameters, a velocity ratio σ w / u c , and a time-scale ratio u c κ 0 / ω w , which can be used to diagnose the effects of wave advection on turbulence spectra. As σ w / u c increases, less variance and covariance appear at low frequencies ( ω < u c κ 0 ) and more appear at high frequencies ( ω > u c κ 0 ). If σ w / u c > 2, wave advection must be taken into account when estimating turbulence length scales and integral quantities (e.g., Reynolds stress) from the low-frequency portion of spectra. The offset of the −5/3 region due to waves is unaffected by the rolloff or dissipation range; therefore, previously proposed methods for estimating dissipation rate from wave-affected −5/3 spectra are robust. Although idealized, the results inform the interpretation of turbulence ω spectra beneath waves and guide the estimation of turbulence properties from those spectra.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosman et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: