Key result
Exercise under hypoxic conditions induced significant increases in physiological stress biomarkers compared to normoxia, with normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia producing broadly similar responses to genuine high altitude.
Why the study?
Does exercise under hypoxic conditions (genuine high altitude, normobaric hypoxia, hypobaric hypoxia) alter physiological stress markers compared to normoxia in healthy adults?
Does exercise under hypoxic conditions (genuine high altitude, normobaric hypoxia, hypobaric hypoxia) alter physiological stress markers compared to normoxia in healthy adults?
Normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia induce broadly similar physiological stress responses to genuine high altitude during exercise, suggesting they are reasonable surrogates for field research.
Supports using simulated hypoxia for physiological testing; extends laboratory capabilities by validating normobaric and.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether there is a differential response at rest and following exercise to conditions of genuine high altitude (GHA), normobaric hypoxia (NH), hypobaric hypoxia (HH), and normobaric normoxia (NN). METHOD: Markers of sympathoadrenal and adrenocortical function [plasma normetanephrine (PNORMET), metanephrine (PMET), cortisol], myocardial injury [highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hscTnT)], and function [N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)] were evaluated at rest and with exercise under NN, at 3375 m in the Alps (GHA) and at equivalent simulated altitude under NH and HH. Participants cycled for 2 h [15-min warm-up, 105 min at 55% Wmax (maximal workload)] with venous blood samples taken prior (T0), immediately following (T120) and 2-h post-exercise (T240). RESULTS: Exercise in the three hypoxic environments produced a similar pattern of response with the only difference between environments being in relation to PNORMET. Exercise in NN only induced a rise in PNORMET and PMET. CONCLUSION: Biochemical markers that reflect sympathoadrenal, adrenocortical, and myocardial responses to physiological stress demonstrate significant differences in the response to exercise under conditions of normoxia versus hypoxia, while NH and HH appear to induce broadly similar responses to GHA and may, therefore, be reasonable surrogates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woods et al. (2017) studied Healthy volunteers (n=14). Hypoxic environments (genuine high altitude, normobaric hypoxia, hypobaric hypoxia) vs. Normobaric normoxia was evaluated on Biochemical markers of physiological stress (PNORMET, PMET, cortisol, hscTnT, NT-proBNP) response to exercise. Exercise under hypoxic conditions induced significant increases in physiological stress biomarkers compared to normoxia, with normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia producing broadly similar responses to genuine high altitude.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: