Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Total state-selected and state-to-state absolute cross sections for the reactions Ar+(2P3/2,1/2)+H2(X,v=0)→Ar (1S0)+H+2(X̃,v′) [reaction (1)], ArH++H [reaction (2)], and H++H+Ar [reaction (3)] have been measured in the center-of-mass collision energy Ec.m. range of 0.24–19.1 eV. Absolute spin–orbit state transition total cross sections (σ3/2→1/2,σ1/2→3/2) for the collisions of Ar+(2P3/2,1/2) with H2 at Ec.m.=1.2–19.1 eV have been obtained. The measured state-selected cross sections for reaction (1) [σ3/2,1/2(H+2)] reveal that at Ec.m.≤5 eV, σ1/2(H+2) is greater than σ3/2(H+2), while the reverse is observed at Ec.m.≥7 eV. The total state-to-state absolute cross sections for reaction (1) (σ3/2,1/2→v′) show unambiguously that in the Ec.m. range of 0.16–3.9 eV the dominant product channel formed in the reaction of Ar+(2P1/2)+H2(X,v=0) is H+2(X̃,v′=2)+Ar. These observations support the conclusion that at low Ec.m. the outcome of charge transfer collisions is governed mostly by the close energy resonance effect. However, at sufficiently high Ec.m.(>6 eV) the charge transfer of Ar+(2P3/2)+H2 is favored compared to that of Ar+(2P1/2)+H2. The relative values measured for X1/2→v′[≡σ1/2→v′/σ1/2 (H+2)] are in good accord with those predicted from calculations using the state-to-state cross sections for the H+2(X̃,v′=0–4)+Ar charge transfer reaction and the relation based on microscopic reversibility. The experimental values for X3/2→v′[≡σ3/2→v′/σ3/2 (H+2)] and those predicted using the microscopic reversibility argument are also in fair agreement. The spin–orbit effect for the cross section of reaction (2) [σ3/2,1/2(ArH+)] is significantly less than that for reaction (1). Both σ3/2(ArH+) and σ1/2(ArH+) decrease rapidly as Ec.m. is increased, and become essentially identical at Ec.m. ≊3.8 eV. The cross sections for reaction (3) observed in the Ec.m. range of 2.5–12 eV are ≤3% of σ3/2,1/2(H+2). The onset for the formation of H+ by reaction (3) is consistent with the thermochemical threshold. The values for σ3/2→1/2 and σ1/2→3/2 observed here are nearly a factor of 2 greater than those measured by the energy loss spectroscopic method. However, the kinetic energy dependencies for σ3/2→1/2 and σ1/2→3/2 are in accord with the previous measurements. Theoretical cross sections for the charge transfer and spin–orbit state transition reactions are calculated at Ec.m.=19.3 eV using the nonreactive infinite-order sudden approximation for comparison with experimental values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: